The „big picture” – CCP

Cross-Cultural Organizational Psychology – Gavreliuc – OOHP

Cultura si interculturalitate organizationala – Gavreliuc – PMOT

Defining culture – synthesis – 2009

RESURSE:

Geert Hofstede:

Geert Hofstede website

Hofstede comparison

studii schwartz spector IC

Spector et al 2001

Hofstede Romania comparativ

Commentary of Hofstede to Spector et al study about psychometric propreties of VSM94

Hofstede – Romania 2010 – cultsocrates

Geert Hofstede – cultural dimensions – web

HOFSTEDE – The Cultural Relativity of Organisational Practices and Theories

Hofstede – RO – 2013-2014

managing_people_across_cultures

Materiale documentare Alin Gavreliuc:

Alin Gavreliuc – Interculturalitate organizationala 1

Alin Gavreliuc – Interculturalitate organizationala 2

Alin Gavreliuc – Interculturalitate organizationala 3

Alin Gavreliuc – Interculturalitate organizationala 4

Alin Gavreliuc – Interculturalitate organizationala 5

STUDII 1 / Reflecții:

 
STUDII 2:
Axiome sociale:
 
 Psihologia interculturală & personalitatea:
 
 
IMQ:
 
 
Valori & transferuri transgeneraționale & trauma
 
 
World Values Surveys:

 

Reflexivity/Critical Psychology/Constructivism/Qualitative Researches

Kenneth J. Gergen:

Acculturated Brain

Psychological Science in a Postmodern Context

Psychological Science in Cultural Context

Relativism-religion-relational well-being

Social Psychology as a History

Assessment and Social Construction – Conflict or co-creation

From Disordering Discourse to Transformative Dialogue

The Ordinary, the Original and the Believable …

Therapeutic challenges of multi-being

K. J. Gergen – Pursuing Excellence in Qualitative Inquiry (2014)
––––––––
Grounded Theory:

Developing a grounded theory approach – a comparison of Glaser and Strauss

Glaser – Conceptualization – On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory

Grounded in Practice – Using Interpretive Research to Built Theory

Grounded theory

GT-Review-vol-9-no-21

HOW TO RECOGNISE A QUALITY GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH STUDY

––––––––

Reaction paper – guide

––––––––

Critical social psychology – relevant researches / turning-points

O sinteză a celor mai importante studii din psihologia socială (cele mai multe foarte recente) care au reprezentat o adevărată cotitură intelectuală în modul în care se poate înțelege dinamica personalității în context de grup.
Pentru fiecare din cele 47 de studii aveți: citarea (în sistem APA), un rezumat al procedurii standard cu o descriere a rezultatelor, o analiză a importanței studiului în ansamblul domeniului (inclusiv numărul de citări de care a avut parte), și precizări privitoare la (eventuale) informații referitoare la mărimea efectului:

Critical social psychology – relevant researches – turning-points

Mai apoi, sunt asociate acestui tabel sinteză TOATE studiile (în cele mai multe cazuri sunt articolele originale, full-text).

1_Time & metaphors

2_Familarity & fluency & judgments

3_Social perception – Muller & Lyer – CC

4_IJzermanSeminAccepted09072010_JESP

5_IJzermanSemin2010

6_Cold and Lonely

7_What up with God

8_schubert_jpsp05

9_Inferring traits from behaviors versus behaviors from traits

10_VanLange_Journal of Personality and Social Psychology_73(4)_1997_u

11_ElliotNiesta_RomanticRed.2008

12_Miyamoto & Kitayama 02

13_The face that launched a thousand ships

14_Rule&Ambady(2008_PsychSci)

15_Rule_etal(2008)

16_The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons

17_Science_LackingControlIncreasesIllusoryPatternPerception

18_self-control_as_limited_resource-_regulatory_depletion_patterns

19_The silence of the library

20_PEER_stage2_10.1016%2Fj.jesp.2008.01.001

21_Local Warming

22_Thinking of you

23_The automated will

24_Feeling the future

25_VerbalReportsOnCausalInfluences

26_Salthouse & Siedlecki (2007) Individual differences analysis of false recognition

27_Tversky & Kahneman – 81

28_Less is better – 10.1.1.199.4182

29_39_Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations

30_greene_fMRI

31_schwarz-bless

32_Choosing versus rejecting

33_Bargh Material Priming

34-Ross-et-al-False-Consensus-Effect

35 – Sex differences in jelaousy

36_Kross-When-Asking-Why-Does-Not-Hurt-2005

37_A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet

38_Reconstrcuting intolerance

40_Warmer hearts

41_uskul_et_al.__in_press_._how_successful…._social_cognition

42_Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures

43_Gray & Wegner (2009) Moral Typecasting. JPSP

44_The Presenter’s Paradox

45_46_Risen&Gilovich.08.JPSP_

47_Rottenstreich – money, kisses & electric shock

Writing the Psychology Paper // Review process:

How to Read a Journal Article in Social Psychology

Harvard – A Brief Guide to Writing the Psychology Paper

D. Bem – Writing the Empirical Journal Article

Helpful guide to write an essay

Anunțuri